← Tous les articles

Cet article n’est pas encore disponible dans votre langue ; nous affichons donc l’original en anglais.

Who owns the eIFU: you or your authorised representative?

Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 assigns every eIFU duty to the manufacturer. What that leaves the authorised representative to verify, hold and produce on request.

MDR · eIFU Regulation · IVDR

A manufacturer established outside the EU can only place devices on the Union market after designating a sole authorised representative (Article 11(1) of the MDR). That representative becomes the manufacturer’s contact point in the Union, holds a defined set of documents, and answers to competent authorities. When such a manufacturer provides its instructions for use electronically, a practical question follows: which of the eIFU obligations move to the representative?

The answer is short. All of the eIFU obligations stay with the manufacturer. The authorised representative verifies that they have been met, keeps the evidence available, and produces it when a competent authority asks. Importers and distributors check what arrives with the device. This post sets out where each of those lines runs, and what happens to the registered eIFU address when the representative changes.

One regulation, one addressee

The conditions for providing instructions for use in electronic form sit in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2226, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1234. Every obligation in it is assigned to one actor. The permission to go electronic, the risk assessment, the conditions on instructions and label, and the website requirements all address manufacturers (Articles 3 to 7). The terms authorised representative, importer and distributor appear nowhere in the regulation or in its amendment.

Every eIFU obligation in Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 is addressed to the manufacturer.

The MDR points the same way. Ensuring that each device is accompanied by the required information, in the languages the Member States concerned determine, is a manufacturer obligation (Article 10(11)). The mandate between a manufacturer and its authorised representative cannot delegate it, because it sits on the list of obligations the mandate may never transfer (Article 11(4)). The electronic form is simply one permitted way of meeting that obligation (Annex I, Section 23.1(f) of the MDR).

Delegating the obligation and outsourcing the work are different things. MDCG 2022-16, the guidance on authorised representatives, notes that the representative is free to assist the manufacturer in performing tasks that the mandate cannot transfer. An authorised representative, or any service provider, can operate the eIFU platform. The responsibility for the conditions stays with you as the manufacturer.

What the authorised representative verifies and holds

The mandate must cover a minimum set of tasks, and the manufacturer must enable the representative to perform them (Article 11(3) of the MDR). Three of them reach the eIFU directly.

  • Verification that the technical documentation and the EU declaration of conformity have been drawn up. For a device supplied with electronic instructions, that documentation should include the documented risk assessment and the verification and validation evidence for the proper design and functioning of the electronic instructions (Articles 4 and 5(5) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2226).
  • Keeping a copy of the technical documentation and the declaration available for competent authorities. The period is at least 10 years after the last device covered by the declaration has been placed on the market, and at least 15 years for implantable devices (Article 10(8)). The manufacturer has a matching duty to keep the necessary documentation permanently available to its representative.
  • Providing a competent authority, on request, with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a device, in an official Union language determined by the Member State concerned.

Read together, these tasks describe a file. A representative taking on a device with electronic instructions should be able to open the risk assessment and the verification and validation evidence. It should hold the arrangements for paper on request, and know where the issued versions and their publication dates are kept. It should also know at which internet address the instructions are published. A representative who cannot produce that file on request is exposed on its own obligations, whatever the state of the manufacturer’s compliance.

The authorised representative’s part is a file: verify that it exists, hold it, and produce it on request.

The representative also carries registration duties of its own. It registers as an economic operator and receives a single registration number (Article 31). It also verifies that the manufacturer has met its UDI and device registration obligations (Article 11(3)(c)).

Why a diligent representative asks about the eIFU

The MDR attaches liability to the role. Where a manufacturer outside the Union has failed to meet its obligations under Article 10, the representative is legally liable for defective devices (Article 11(5)). That liability runs on the same basis as the manufacturer’s, jointly and severally with it. MDCG 2022-16 explains that it is conditional: the manufacturer’s liability for the defective device has to be established first, together with its failure to meet Article 10.

The duty to supply the required information with the device is one of the Article 10 obligations. An eIFU arrangement that fails its conditions may amount to a failure of that duty. Questions from a prospective representative about hosting, retention periods and paper on request are a direct consequence of the liability it is accepting.

What importers and distributors check

Before placing a device on the market, importers verify that it is labelled in accordance with the MDR and accompanied by the required instructions for use (Article 13(2)). They also verify that an authorised representative has been designated. Distributors verify that the device is accompanied by the information the manufacturer must supply, and may do so using a representative sampling method (Article 14(2)).

For a device supplied with electronic instructions, those checks land on the label and the access information. The label must state that the instructions are supplied in electronic form (Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2226). Information on how to access them, including how paper can be requested, travels on the packaging or in a paper document with the device. An importer or distributor checking an eIFU device is checking that this access information is present and coherent.

Translation and repackaging are the activities that sit closest to manufacturer territory. A distributor or importer may translate the information supplied with a device, or repackage it for a national market, without taking on the manufacturer’s obligations (Article 16(2)). The same article makes that conditional, on a quality management system certified by a notified body and on advance notice. The language of the published electronic instructions is a separate matter. Making them available in the language each Member State determines is a condition on the manufacturer (Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2226).

Changing representative without breaking the eIFU

A change of authorised representative must be governed by an agreement between the manufacturer, the incoming representative and, where practicable, the outgoing one (Article 12 of the MDR). The agreement addresses the dates and the transfer of documents. It fixes how long the outgoing representative may still appear in the information supplied by the manufacturer, and covers complaints that arrive after the mandate ends. For an eIFU device, the transferred documents should include the file described above.

The representative’s name and address appear on the label when the manufacturer is established outside the Union. The instructions for use themselves are under no such requirement. The MDR lists the representative among the label particulars and leaves it out of the list for the instructions (Annex I, Sections 23.2(d) and 23.4(a)). A change of representative therefore forces a label change, and it only touches the content of the instructions where the manufacturer chose to name the representative there.

In the UDI database, the representative’s name and address are among the data elements filed against each UDI-DI (Annex VI, Part B, point 7 of the MDR). A new UDI-DI is only required for changes that could lead to misidentification of the device, such as a new name, model or package quantity. A change of representative leaves the identity of the device untouched, so it is handled as an update to the existing record, made within 30 days.

The eIFU address deserves more care than either of those fields. The internet address at which the instructions are published must remain stable and directly accessible throughout the retention periods (Article 7(2)(e)). The periods run to 10 years after the last device is placed on the market, and at least 2 years past the expiry date of the last produced device (Article 5). For implantable devices and devices without an expiry date, they run to 15 years. The manufacturer must also provide that address to the UDI database, at the latest from the date device registration in EUDAMED applies (Article 7(3)).

An address on the representative’s own domain ties a decade of regulatory commitment to a mandate either party can end.

An address published on a domain that belongs to the representative ties a regulatory commitment of a decade or more to a commercial mandate that either party can end. An address independent of that relationship survives a change of representative with nothing to re-register. That is the arrangement to insist on, whether the instructions sit on your own domain or on a dedicated eIFU platform such as the one Ydntfy operates.

The same architecture for IVDs

The IVDR defines the authorised representative, the importer and the distributor in the same way and assigns them the same roles, in its own Articles 11 to 14. The eligibility rules for electronic instructions differ, because Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 was made under the MDR and applies only to devices within its scope. For in vitro diagnostics, the permission for non-paper instructions sits in the IVDR itself (Annex I, Section 20.1). A separate post will take the IVD rulebook on its own.

What to settle in the mandate

The regulation leaves the division of labour to the mandate and the change-of-representative agreement, so that is where to fix it. Four points are worth writing down explicitly for a device with electronic instructions:

  • Operation. Which party runs the website, and to what service level.
  • Evidence flow. How the representative receives each revision of the risk assessment and each newly issued version of the instructions.
  • Paper requests. Who answers a paper request that reaches the representative, and within what time.
  • Exit. What happens to the published address if the mandate ends.

Each point has a statutory anchor cited above, and the regulation leaves the answer to the contract.

Sources

Primary sources. Every claim in this post is traceable to one of these, and the sub-provisions behind each paragraph-level citation are itemised here.

Show 6 sources · 3 references
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR), OJ L 117, 5.5.2017: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj
    • Article 2(32) to (34), definitions. Article 10(8) and (11), manufacturer obligations. Article 11(1), (3), (4) and (5), authorised representative. Article 12, change of authorised representative, points (a) to (d). Article 13(2), importers. Article 14(2), distributors, including the sampling method. Article 16(1) to (4), relabelling, translation and repackaging. Articles 27, 29 and 31, UDI and registration. Annex I, Sections 23.1(f), 23.2(d) and 23.4(a): the representative is a label particular under 23.2(d), and 23.4(a) omits it from the instructions. Annex VI, Part B, points 7 and 22, and Part C, Sections 3.9 and 5.8.
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 on electronic instructions for use, OJ L 448, 15.12.2021: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2021/2226/oj
    • Articles 3 and 4. Article 5, points (3), (5), (9), (10), (11) and (13). Article 6, paragraphs (1) to (3). Article 7(2)(e).
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1234 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 as regards the medical devices for which the instructions for use may be provided in electronic form, OJ L, 26.6.2025: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/1234/oj
    • Article 1, point (6)(b), inserting Article 7(3) on the UDI database.
  • MDCG 2022-16, Guidance on authorised representatives, October 2022: https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0a7613cb-6b9a-4396-a4c6-d2479e43e167_en?filename=mdcg_202216_en.pdf
  • MDCG 2021-27 Rev.1, Questions and answers on Articles 13 and 14 of the MDR and IVDR: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-12/mdcg_2021-27_en.pdf
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR), OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, Articles 11 to 14 and Annex I, Section 20.1(f): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746/oj

MDCG guidance documents are endorsed by the Medical Device Coordination Group and are not legally binding.

About this post

Ydntfy runs electronic instructions for use for medical device and IVD manufacturers, built to the conditions in Articles 4 to 7 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 for devices under the MDR and to Annex I, Section 20.1(f) of the IVDR for in vitro diagnostics. You can see how it works at ydntfy.com.

Originally published at https://ydntfy.com/en/blog/authorised-representative-eifu-responsibility/ on 21 August 2026. You are welcome to quote or reuse this, with a link back.